#misfiled These 3 pages (208/209/210) are orders for the 8th Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers
-
They are in with the orders for the 2nd Battalion Royal Irish Regiment. Pages running in sequence.
Page 208 Link: https://talk.operationwardiary.org/#/subjects/AWD0003jqp
Page 209 Link: https://talk.operationwardiary.org/#/subjects/AWD0003jzd
Page 210 Link: https://talk.operationwardiary.org/#/subjects/AWD0003jxwPosted
-
by
ral104
moderator, scientist
It's possible the 2nd RIR were supporting the 8th Inniskillings and got a copy of the orders for reference.
Posted
-
You are correct Ral in what you say. The 2nd Btn Royal Irish Regiment are mentioned in para. 5 top of page on this link:
https://talk.operationwardiary.org/#/subjects/AWD0003jzdWhen these pages came up I thought they were misfiled because they were headed orders from the 8th Inniskilling Fusiliers. Have not come across this before when orders come up. Shall I remove the #misfiled comment from these pages and insert a comment saying "That they are copy orders for the 2nd Battalion Royal Irish Regiment"?
Pity I did not tag them as such when I came across the same thing later as reported to you!
Posted
-
by
cyngast
moderator
If you don't mind and it's easy to find those pages again, it would probably help avoid confusion if you could remove the #misfiled hashtag and add in a comment that they are a reference for the 2nd RIR who are in support.
Posted
-
The comments misfiled, on Order pages for the 2nd Battalion Royal Irish Regiment 208,209 and 210 have been altered to read: This is a copy of an order for the 2nd Battalion of the Royal Irish Regiment, in support - Not misfiled.
Pages were easy to find I had a note of the references to these pages.Posted
-
by
ral104
moderator, scientist
Great. Thanks, Marie.
Posted