9th Battalion Norfolk Regiment, Diary page for February 1917
-
by
Mary_mn
Really good information but very difficult to tag. Handwriting and layout is very cramped and all over the place! Suggest it needs to be independently checked. Names & numbers of casualties for the month including date of injury/death included.
Posted
-
by
HeatherC
moderator
I assume you mean this one? http://talk.operationwardiary.org/#/subjects/AWD0002qwc
The nature of the Project means it will be tagged by at least 5 people and then a "best fit" taken from the tags you all place. I'm afraid there isn't anyone to "independently check" pages as far as I know - that's the whole point of crowd sourcing.
Posted
-
by
ral104
moderator, scientist
Yes, absolutely - with five people checking each page, even one like this, which is obviously pretty difficult to tag, should be recorded to a good degree of accuracy.
Posted